In the
differential diagnosis of the migraine headache syndromes, one should first
consider the classification of headaches presented in Table 1, and the comments
on the new headache classification.227
Headaches in
general should be considered as a serious medical problem only when they become
continuous or recur frequently, as almost everyone suffers from occasional
headache. Dalessio235 discusses the approach to diagnosing a severe
headache: “Although headache remains one of the most common medical complaints,
even its most severe and chronic manifestations are rarely caused by organic
disease. In a given year, nearly three quarters of Americans have headaches,
but of these, only 5% seek medical help.”235 When the complaint is
of a persistent or recurrent headache, the history becomes of primary importance
in establishing the proper diagnosis. Additional description of the
characteristics of the nonmigrainous headaches are found in standard references
on headache.14,15,203 The question arises as to which conditions are
confused with migraine and when should one reasonably proceed to a more detailed
investigation or referral to a specialist.
When a new headache occurs, particularly in an adult who has never been
prone to headache and in which atypical features are present, such as
persistent focal pain, then disorders other than migraine should be
carefully ruled out. When obvious disease of cranial or extra cranial
structures
accompanies the
headache, little diagnostic confusion results. However, when cephalgia persists
without readily apparent reason, further evaluation is needed.
General
physical and neurologic examination in patients with migraine, aside from
the complicated varieties, is normal. Conditions which may be confused with
each of the migraine syndromes described previously will be briefly
reviewed.
Migraine
without aura, as emphasized earlier, should not be diagnosed simply by the
presence of headache. Tension or muscle contraction headache alone or in
combination with a vascular component is most often confused with common
migraine. The periodicity, associated symptoms (nausea, photophobia, and
fluid retention), and family history all weigh in favor of migraine.
Persistent pain, absent family history, muscle tenderness, and bizarre
descriptions such as "a knife being driven through the skull" raise the
possibility of muscle contraction or psychogenic headache. Any neurologic
abnormality on examination, such as mild hemiparesis, consistent sensory
defect, or reflex asymmetry, again suggests the possibility of intracranial
disease and traction headache. Headache from intracranial sources is
produced most often by inflammation, traction and displacement, or
distension of pain‑sensitive structures, usually dura and blood vessels.
Exact correlation of headache site with intracranial mass lesions is often
misleading; but in general, lesions of the posterior fossa produce occipital
headache, and hemispheric tumors produce more anterior, frontal headache.
In the absence of increased intracranial pressure, the headache tends to be
localized to the side of the lesion.
Cranial
arteritis, a disorder of the elderly, often produces headache, frequently
without overt signs. The headache can be severe and accompanied by
tenderness of the extra cranial arteries. In the older patient the
investigation of a new headache should always include a sedimentation rate
as a screening test for cranial arteritis.
Migraine
with aura (classic migraine), in its complete form with slowly progressive
visual aura, is virtually never caused by an organic process. A question is
frequently raised as to the possibility of arteriovenous malformation.
While headaches may indeed be present with arteriovenous malformation, such
vascular lesions more commonly present as subarachnoid hemorrhage or
seizure. In a review of occipital lobe arteriovenous malformations, Troost
and Newton7 determined that the characteristic visual phenomena
represent occipital epilepsy, and the nonalternating, unilateral character
of the headache, as well as the history of a seizure, always distinguished
these vascular malformations from migraine. Rarely, an arteriovenous
malformation may produce clinical symptomatology, which in a single episode
is indistinguishable from an episode of classic migraine.73 The
invariant nature of the attack, lack of response to therapy, and presence of
abnormality on examination, such as a cranial bruit, should lead to
additional diagnostic studies in these unusual patients. A normal physical
examination, family history, and response to therapy should eliminate the
need to perform neuroradiologic studies in the vast majority of patients
with migraine.
Common,
classic, and complicated migraine may be precipitated by trauma. If the
typical clinical pattern of one of the migraine syndromes follows head
trauma, other additional causes such as subdural hematoma need not be
sought. Complicated migraine can present some of the most difficult
diagnostic problems, particularly in the absence of prior episodes or
family history. The acute onset of neurologic dysfunction and headache in
this setting must always be regarded initially as caused by another process,
such as cerebrovascular disease or rapidly growing tumor, and must be fully
investigated. Again the prior history of uncomplicated common or classic
migraine may lessen the suspicion of another process in a given individual.
Ophthalmoplegic “migraine” should be diagnosed only in the typical clinical
setting described in the previous section: a young individual with history
of recurrent ophthalmoplegic episodes or known migraine. Sudden oculomotor
nerve palsy associated with previous chronic headache, or with new acute
severe headache, should be considered caused by aneurysm until proved
otherwise. With aneurysm, the history is not one of recurrent episodes of
ophthalmoplegia with full recovery. Occasionally other congenital vascular
anomalies, meningeal inflammation, or neoplastic disease may produce painful
ophthalmoplegia. Diabetic oculomotor palsy usually occurs in older
individuals with diabetes, spares the pupil, and is rarely recurrent.
Sphenoid sinus mucocele may present as a recurrent headache and third nerve
palsy;236 radiologic studies should clarify the diagnostic
dilemma.
Cranial
nerve abnormality other than oculosympathetic paresis in a patient with
"cluster" headache should alert the physician to an intracranial mass lesion
(Rader paratrigeminal neuralgia, type 1). Persistent localized pain most
often makes this cluster atypical and points to a different etiology.
In
general, a knowledge of the different headache varieties other than
migraine and a careful history and examination will lead to the appropriate
diagnosis.
Return to Migraine Chapter